Let’s say I put $20 in a box. Now you do the same. The box now contains $40, and we’re both aware of this fact. Now, I sell you the box for $30. We both walk away with $10 profit.
Repeat forever, and you’ve got an infinite supply of money. Wait, wut?
At first glance, this brain teaser might raise eyebrows, but once you recognize the fallacy and work it out, your dreams of early retirement come to an abrupt end…
This is an example of the “hidden-cost” fallacy, which occurs when you ignore relevant costs into your calculations. A common hidden-cost fallacy is to ignore the opportunity cost of capital when making an investment or shutdown decisions.
On to the puzzle’s solution…
You put in $20 in the box (-20), you then sold the box for $30 (+30).
-20 + 30 = +10
So you have a profit of $10.
Your friend put in $20 in the box (-20), then gives you another $30 for purchasing the box (-30), and then gets $40 from the contents of box (+40) because they bought it off you.
– 20 – 30 + 40 = -50 + 40 = $-10
Your friend has lost $10.
In other words, your friend had a revenue of $40, but a cost of $50, making this far from infinite money for both you and your friend.
This puzzle is similar to the fast talking in the Abbott and Costello skit, “Two Tens for a Five“…
Relatively Interesting promotes science, reason, critical thinking, and the magic of reality. We point the skeptical eye at pseudoscience, quackery, religion, and the paranormal. Nothing is off limits, and everything is up for discussion. We also curate and share the many amazing things that exist in the natural world, the feats and accomplishments that humanity has achieved, and the incredible discoveries our universe has to offer. Subjects include (but are not limited to!) space, history, geography, geology, biology, chemistry, physics, economics, psychology, language, and how stuff works.