20 Years of Computing: Comparing 1995’s tech to 2015’s

December 12, 2015 10
20 Years of Computing:  Comparing 1995’s tech to 2015’s

This article is a significant update to a version written in 2012.  It has been edited to include new articles, ads, some nostalgic games, reviews, and technology from 1995.  It’s also been updated with 2015 numbers, where applicable.  If you liked the first version, you’ll probably like this one too.


I recently stumbled upon a computer science project I did in high school (back in 1995) entitled “Technology in Society”. We were tasked with finding newspaper articles that demonstrated technology in various work spaces. Discovering a gem like this – especially after two decades have passed – is eye opening and mind boggling.

Reading through it, I drifted back to my teenage years and recalled my earliest experiences with a PC: the excitement and surprise when reading through Compton’s Encyclopedia; playing DOOM and Wolfenstein with a newly installed sound card; and browsing a primitive Web 1.0 Internet on Netscape Navigator. These experiences would form the foundation for my future career in the online, interactive space.

To get this started, this is what the homepage of CNN.com looked like in 1995:

1995 CNN.com Homepage


Home computing has come a very long way, and so I thought I’d share a few of the articles from that 1995 project.

The first article article, written by Paul De Groot and published in 1995 in the Montreal Gazette, went as follows:


Here’s the Fall ’95 version of a basic computer Fall 1995 Version of a Home Computer

Let me tell you about a computer advertisement from 1993.

One company was advertising 9,600-baud modems for as low as $500. Dell was selling a top-of-the-line 486 with a 66MHz processor, eight megabytes of RAM and a 320-megabyte hard drive for $4,400.

The single biggest difference is in the hard drive prices. Three hundred dollars got you 80 megabytes, and a one-gigabyte drive from IBM cost more than $3,000. Single speed CD-ROMs sold for $600. Today, if you could buy this hardware, it would cost between 10 and 25% of what it cost two years ago.

Let’s look at the latest crop of computers and see what’s happened since last fall.

Memory (RAM): We seem to have convinced most manufacturers to adopt eight megabytes as standard, compared with four megabytes in 1994. Don’t buy less than eight. The difference in performance between an eight megabyte machine and a four-megabyte machine can be dramatic.

Hard Drives: One-gigabyte hard drives are common this year, compared with the 400-500 megabyte drives of 1994. The price difference between the two is only about $200, and it’s worth it.

Monitors: In 1995, we’re edging into 15-inch monitors as standard, compared with the 14-inchers of the past, but the extra inch adds little. If you really need more monitor, go for a 17-inch screen and pay the $400 premium.

Video: We’re into 24-bit accelerated video cards these days, and while these cards look great in benchmark tests, faster processors and faster circuitry make accelerated video less critical. The 24-bit feature affects color depth – that is, the ability of the computer to display more than 256 colors (which is eight-bit color). A 24-bit card can display up to 17 million colors – nice if you’ve got 24-bit images to look at, but few programs require such depth. You needn’t go to 24-bit color to improve on the standard 256-color display: many inexpensive video cards have 32,000 or 64,000 color modes which are already a substantial improvement.

Sound cards: In 1995, we’re seeing more cards with wavetable synthesis, which provides more realistic representation of musical instruments. But there’s not much software which requires this: the sound of a plasma blaster in DOOM is not a musical instrument. Unless you’re serious about music, you might want to pass on wavetable sound for now.

Modems: The 14.4k modems are on the way out and 28.8 is in. I’d tend toward 28.8 for about an extra $100, but a 14.4 is pretty quick and will capably handle email.

CD-ROMs: In 1994, double-speed drives were mainstream and quad-speed drives were in the future. Well, the future is here. I’d like to say you don’t need to spend extra here, but I think software makers are already assuming people have quad-speed drives. Go for a quad if you can.”


A Lot Can Change in 20 Years

A table to summarize how far we’ve come in 20 years…

1995 PC
2015 PC
8mb at $400 per 4 MB
8 gigabytes is common…, which is 8,000 megabytes
Hard Drive
400 to 1,000 megabytes
500 Gigabytes is low end… which is 500,000 megabytes.  500 GB can be as low as $50.  Terabyte drives are common (1,000,000 megabytes) for less than the cost of a 1994, 400 MB drive.  Depending on quality, cache, etc, price can also be as low as $50.
4,000 MHz+ with multiple cores (it’s very affordable to get 8) and countless optimizations (clock speed is not a clear measurement for processing power)
24-bit accelerated
PCI Express 2 (replacing PCI, and then AGP) with 1-2 Gigabytes of dedicated RAM, for about $250
14” CRT
24” wide screen LCD/LED
Sound Blaster 16 (16-bit)
24-bit, PCI Express, 3d, quad core processors with onboard RAM
Obsolete, except for users in very rural areas
Optical Disk
Arguably moving towards obsolescence with digital downloads so prevalent. BluRay, DVD, some CD-ROM remain…

Here’s another article in a similar vein (still part of the same project!).

“Yanks big on home tech”, by David Jundson, 1995 in the Montreal Gazette.

yanks big on homr tech

On a typical day, 24 million Americans use a home computer for some personal or work related task,” reports the Time Mirror Center for the People and The Press in a study. The report found a “new wave” of demographically distinct consumers is joining the ranks of computer users. CD-ROM drives, capable of offering users moving graphics, sound, and access to encyclopedias or games, are proliferating. More than half of new home computer purchases include CD-ROMS.

Commercial on-line services such as Compuserve and America Online, connecting users to such diverse sources as world weather reports or car-buying guides, are rapidly being embraced. From the beginning of 1994 to June of 1995, the number of Americans using online services jumped from 5 million to 12 million.

Other interesting findings:

Among all Americans, 18% do some work from home using a computer. 7% say they operated a home-based business using a computer.

Of the 14 million regular on-line users, 53% are heavy email users, and email is by far the largest category of use. 41% perform work or research, and 30% get news from an on-line service. Also, while women often lag behind men in technology use, not so with email. 65% of women on-line users communicate via email with friends or family, whereas 56% of men report doing so.

The poll found that 32% of households overall have a PC. Of those, 15% have been bought in the past year (between 1994 and 1995). 44% of people under 50 have a PC, which 23% of people over 50 do. The percentage of men owning a computer is 41% compared with 32% for women. The poll found 38% of white households using computers and 23% of African American households doing so.

To compare with today’s numbers…

Globally in 2015, roughly 3 billion people on Earth now use the Internet.  Let’s put that in perspective for a moment.

There are 1.2 billion Catholics and 1.6 billion Muslims in the world, totaling 2.8 billion. There are more people using the internet since the 1990’s than there are Catholics and Muslims combined – and they’ve had thousands of years to grow their numbers.

World Internet penetration: 1995 to 2015

Source: Internet Live Stats


And here’s the data to back the graph.  Less have half a percent used the internet in 1995, compared to 40.4% in 2015.  This is astonishing growth.  What will it look like in 2035?

Table" Internet Penetration by Country, 1995-2015

Oh, and the number of connected devices?  In 2012 it was 8.7 billion.  In 2020, it’ll be about 75 billion.


Windows:  Pretty Slick for Its Time

On August 24th, 1995, Microsoft launched Windows 95.  Personally, it was a big day for me.  I went from Windows 3.1 and upgraded to the Windows 95.  The Start button introduced itself, and is still (by most accounts) popular today.  You could have long file names, which was a godsend.  Graphically, it was fairly intuitive, and looked pretty good.

You could install Windows 95 from just thirteen 1.68MB floppy disks. The ISO for Windows 10 is nearly 4GB.

Windows 95 Box


According to PC Gamer, the “advanced features of Windows 95 will meant companies providing services via the MS Network could bring visual style into the online equation.”  Sure thing.

Windows 95 Advert, 1995


I Am A Nostalgic Geek:  Here’s my 1st PC

ibm+ambraI remember my first computer well… It was an IBM Ambra, with a 25MHz processor, 4MB of RAM and a 220 Megabyte hard drive. There was no sound, no video card, and no CD-ROM. Later, we upgraded to 8MB of RAM for $450, and then added a sound card and CD-ROM “multimedia package” for about $600.

Now, I use a desktop, laptop and iPhone 6s, iPad (and iPad Mini), PlayStation 3, and a couple of old server PCs (all of which are vastly more powerful than that machine from 1995). Plus, I use several cloud based applications for online storage. They’re all interconnected and used on a regular basis.

Speaking of portable storage, you don’t even have to go as far back as 1995 to see dramatic changes in size and price.  Portable flash cards have increased in size by orders of magnitude and have dropped in price by the same. A 128 Gb card today costs around $50, or roughly $0.39 per gig.  A card with 128MB capacity cost roughly $30 in 2005… which works out to $234 per gig.

sd card comparison 2005 2015

PC Gamez:  1995 Stylez

Fortunately, I also kept (and found) a piece of my gaming history as well:  copies of of the May, 1995 PC Gamer (featuring Aliens and X-COM:  Terror from the Deep) and July, 1995 Computer Gaming World (featuring MechWarrior 2 and a sneak preview of Duke Nukem 3D).


PC Gamer and Computer Gaming World: 1995


The most popular games in May of 1995 were Panzer General, Dark Forces, and X-COM: Terror From The Deep.  Take a look at the gaming studios associated with the Top 10 – how many remain today?  How many of these games did you score from now defunct “warez” sites?


Most Popular PC Games 1995


And then, a full page review in PC Gamer for the original Warcraft by Blizzard Entertainment.  It was rated as an Editor’s Choice (good call), and, “mixes action and strategy in a brew so addictive it should come with a warning label.”.

The requirements for the game were a 386/ 25MHz; CD-ROM drive; 4MB of RAM; 2MB of hard drive space; VGA; and a mouse.  But for the best experience, PC Gamer recommended a 486SX/25 MGz with a compatible sound card.  Amazing – can you imagine listing a “mouse” or “sound card” as a requirement?

Warcraft would become one of Blizzard’s most successful franchises, followed by sequels, character spin-offs for use in other Blizzard games like Hearthstone and Heroes of the Storm, and would become the universe and framework for most successful MMO ever, World of Warcraft.  The franchise would even boast a full length movie (due out in 2016), titled appropriately, “Warcraft“.


1995 PC Gamer Review of Blizzard Entertainment Warcraft


I jumped on the Wacraft bandwagon when Warcraft 2: Tides of Darkness was released.  At the time, I was still enthralled with Doom, Heretic, Hexen, and Wolfenstein.  Speaking of Wolfenstein…  the graphics have improved by such a large margin that they are almost incomparable.

William B.J. Blazkowicz,  from 1992’s Wolfenstein compared to 2014… 22 years makes a big difference:


Wolfentstein: Then and Now



Virtual Reality in 1995?  Wut?

In 2015, we boast about the quality of VR peripherals like Oculus Rift.  When its development kit was made public, the results were astonishing.  It felt like VR really was close this time… and sure enough, it’s scheduled to launch in 2016 and is already miles ahead of the orginal version.

But before Oculus Rift, there was “i-glasses!‘, back in 1995.  Heck, back then, if I had two heads, I’d buy one for each!  The magazine was bold enough to say that PC gaming should get ready for virtual reality because it was around the corner and that “PC gaming may never be the same.”.  It feels like until a couple of years a go, and nearly two decades later, you could say the same thing and still be correct.  This time… this time… it feels like virtual reality really is just around the corner.

Virtual Reality in 1995


We’ve come a long way

The Apollo Guidance Computer clocked in a 2 MHz and had 4 KB of RAM.  A Nintendo Entertainment System clocked in at 1.8 MHz with 2 KB of RAM.  That means we could combine two NESs and you’d equal the processing power to get to the moon (admittedly, this is a gross simplification).

Processing power of moon appollo Nintendo Entertainment System

Source: Experts Exchange

I’m excited to see where we’ll go from here.  How will it affect gaming and the entertainment industry as a whole?  Will peripheral devices supporting virtual reality finally take off?  What world problems will we be able to solve, and at what cost?


Do you remember your  first computer?  What games did you play?  What do you miss?


  • Damian

    That’s a real blast from the past. I got into Warcraft when Tides of Darkness came out too and of course played WoW for years. My first machine was similar to the authors – a 486 with a whopping 4 mb or RAM and roughly 200mb of hard drive space. When I was in school, I remember getting a Diamond video card and it had 16 megs of on board RAM, which was epic (at the time).
    Another thing – do you remember buying games at the store? Remember when games “went gold”? I remember getting into the Diablo 2 beta and getting an actual CD. Now, everything is digital downloads (mainly on Steam). I also remember when Steam first came out and the collection was very limited. I didn’t think it would last. I was clearly wrong!

  • Nate Whitten

    Monochrome monitor, 5.25″ floppy drive, and DOS basically describe my first computer. Sorry I can’t be more specific, but it was the late 80s and I was born in 83. Mostly I played games like Rogue and Akalabeth, even though they were about a decade old at the time.

  • Mark_42

    The games I miss most are Lode Runner and the Mac’s Marathon series.

  • Mark_42

    Try going back 30-35 years. My first HD was a 12 pound, 20 meg Sider D2. I recall having a punch that would make a square read/write hole in 5.25″ floppies so both sides could be used.

  • alainmartel

    My first computer:

    Apple ][+ with 48K of ram, apple DOS 3.3. Audio cassette tape and floppy based storage. It was TOP OF THE LINE at the time! I still have it and it’s still functional.

    An external 5 Mb HD was anounced at 5000$, colour and design matched to sit atop of the Apple ][. In the add, they said that it gives you more storage that you can ever dream of.

  • M.A.N.T.I.S.

    Thank you very much for this post. I end up landing on this page by typing “1995 PC vs 2015 PC” on Google which your old page “1995 PC vs 2012 PC comparison” is still ranking and referred me here. I hope this post ranks soon!

    Anyways I was born in the early 80’s and it took me a while to understand how amazing a PC truly is hence I got into the PC game somewhat late. So I end up buying my first PC in 2005. It was a refurbished Emachines all in one package on sale at Best Buy for 700$. The package included a square 17 inch Emachines lcd monitor, T3092 Emachines computer, a set of cheap Emachines speakers which the sound became distorted once you crank the volume to high, a keyboard and mouse. The PC had a 500 gig hard drive, a DVD burner and 500 meg of RAM which I later added another 500 megs and it made a big difference. I don’t remember all the other specs in detail. At the time I knew almost noting about PC’s when I bought this package nonetheless I only used it for downloading movies, browsing the internet, buying stuffs online and reading emails.

    In 2012 the motherboard died on me and Windows XP was becoming obsolete the next year. Furthermore during that 7 years I learned more about PCs hence I now knew it was better to read reviews and buy components separately and not all in one packages. So I bought an IBM Thinkcentre 0958B2U running on Windows 7 that came with 4 gig of ram, a 500 gig hard drive and a quad core processor for 700$. That PC was not all that fast and powerful nonetheless I only used it for the same purpose as the old one. Still it was a very big upgrade. To complete it I bought an LG IPS 22 Inch Monitor, Edifier Exclaim E10 Speakers and an Azio Illuminated keyboard (which I end up wondering how I manged all these years with a keyboard that was not illuminated) and used the Lenovo mouse that came with the PC.

    In 2015 I became interested in video editing so I needed something more powerful. So I bough am IBM Thinkcentre M83 I7-4790 3.60 GHz quad core processor that had a 256 gig solid state hard drive (which made a big difference in loading programs and booting time) and 8 gig of ram which I later bought another 8 gig. To complete it I bought a Logitech K740 illuminated keyboard, an Edifier Exclaim E10 Speakers, an internal 6 TB hard drive and two LG IPS 22 inch monitors (22MP47HQ-P) since that PC supports dual screen.

    The amazing thing to retain from this story is that with tax my 2015 PC set up cost me around 2430$. While that PC set up still may not be state of the art, it is still a decent PC set up. Hence if you compared the price to that 1993 advertisement at 4400$ and its specs, you can clearly see that it his half the price hence there is no comparison.

  • Jesse_Bruce_Pinkman

    I stumbled upon this article when I tried looking for comparison between today’s technology and somewhere 20 years before after seeing a Season 2 Episode of Friends where chandler boasts of his state of the art laptop with killer specs. After hearing his top of the line specs, my jaw dropped at how far we’ve come. I also got depressed at how old Matthew Perry looks like now compared to his youthful looked in that show.

    I have totally forgotten the specs back in the day.

    But let me tell you this, I have a young colleague at work who was born in the 90’s, and he has never seen a floppy drive. I think it was abominable.

  • although it is 2016 years, I still using micro SD 128 MB

  • jkk5us

    MOS KIM-1 Released: 1976 Price: US $245

    CPU: MOS 6502, 1MHz

    RAM: 1024 bytes

    Display: 6 digital LED display

    Input: on-board hexadecimal keypad

    Ports: edge connector with- 30 digital I/O lines

    Storage: cassette recorder

    OS: machine code (HEX)

  • Alastair J. Archibald

    By the way, two more big difference in processors since 1995: cache sizes and word length (64 bit vs 32 bit is a HUGE increase).

    My first computer was a BBC Micro Model B

    MOS Technology 6502 2MHz 8-bit processor
    32kB 8-bit RAM
    Screen resolution up to 640 × 256 (monochrome), 320 x 256 (4 colours), 150 x 256 (8 colours), 480 x 500 (8 colours, Teletext)
    No GUI
    Onboard BASIC
    Full mechanical QWERTY keyboard
    “Tube” interface for second 6502 or Z80 co-processor
    RS-423 serial port
    Centronics parallel (printer) port
    6-pin DIN RGB port
    UHF RF modulator (TV connector)